Build the future in public. Label the evidence clearly.

Why this boundary matters

Page components render approved information. Visitor context records only what improves understanding. Conversation and tools can be added independently, with their own privacy, permission and evaluation controls.

• No unrestricted actions in phase one.
• No raw problem statement saved to local storage.
• No generated legal, pricing or factual claims.
• Future CRM and calendar tools remain behind explicit consent.

Current release boundary

What this demonstration can and cannot do.

The guide can change explanation depth, classify a selected or typed operational problem and show an approved starting point. It records only the chosen depth and problem categories in local browser storage. The typed description remains component state and disappears when the page is left or refreshed.

It cannot inspect a CRM, remember a named visitor, make a booking, create a lead or generate a contractual recommendation. The contact form is a separate explicit submission to Codemind. That boundary keeps a useful phase-one interaction available without presenting future agent capability as finished software.

Engineering evidence

The public site follows the same control argument.

• Core pages and technical variants are approved, indexable content.
• Legacy routes resolve directly to relevant V2 destinations.
• Contact input is bounded, validated and escaped on the server.
• Production delivery fails closed when shared limiting or email is unavailable.
• Liveness and dependency readiness are separate signals.
• Automated checks cover guidance, contact behavior, canonical output, schema, sitemap and production crawling.

These checks show the current website implementation. They are not a claim that a future customer agent, CRM tool or memory system has already passed the same release process.